This movie is bad propaganda for Scientology. This is already obvious after five minutes watching. First, evolution is called 'Theory of Randomness' and described as something sad by Nicolas Cage.

Their efforts constantly find the 'Duke Boys' eluding authorities in 'The General Lee', their 1969 orange Dodge Charger that keeps them one step ahead of the dimwitted antics of the small southern town's Sheriff, Roscoe P. Coltrane.The Dukes of Hazzard 2005 IMDBThe Dukes of Hazzard 2005 Box Office MojoThe Dukes of Hazzard 2005 movie onlineThe.

Of course, there's no mention at all of all the proofs of evolution, even when Cage is supposed to be this serious MIT teacher. The little girl Lucinda is born in 1952, year of Scientology creation. The time capsule is sealed under a seven branch star, the symbol of Scientology.

Then, the story is very closed of the one in the book 'Scientology, A History of Man' written by L.Ron Hubbard, Scientology founder. The movie described a numerological prophecy of apocalypse, something frequent in Scientology's mythology. The more ridiculous is the final image of the Eden Garden with Adam and Eve running to the knowledge tree! When you're watching such a movie, remember that Quentin Hubbard, the son of Scientology founder, was probably murdered for having told the world that his father is a liar and and criminal. And - mainly - remember Darwin. This film started out with a real grabber. The whole time capsule thing was working as was the predictions and it had me riveted waiting to find out what was going to happen next.

Then everything went left and the movie bounded over the shark as Cage begins a wild chase to tell everyone about the end of the world. I absolutely believe this screenplay wasn't written with the ending that was in the movie. I figure around one third of the way through someone said, 'hey this is way too M.

Night Shymalan, better beef up the special effects!' That's when the explosions started.

Then another Hollywood big-wig said, 'hey, we need to add some extraterrestrials or this will never hit' and so enter the blond guys in the woods. These scenes look like they were re-shot after the fact. Finally as Cage is on his knees waving to his son on the space ship, I expected the credits to roll, but no.

I feel pretty sure a focus group was show the first cut and they said it was a downer, so.after a rewrite and lots of money on special effects. Vyazanij kot opisanie. End of the world.

Ten, after another focus group, comes the two kids in Eden ending that looked completely out of place and I feel pretty sure was tacked on after audience reactions ranged from'but what about the kids?' To 'that's a downer'. All in all, the whole thing went way off the rails and squandered any viewer interest in favor of bad theology and worse writing. If anyone can confirm my theories of rewrites and re-shoots, please let me know. Junior miss pageant torrent full. Otherwise, I have to believe the producers just got lost somewhere along the way to what promised to be a good film. I can't believe people are calling this the 'best SF movie of the year', unless there aren't any other SF movies this year. Ebert obviously needs to adjust his meds if he gave this four stars.